Please select the target of this 360-degree feedback
James Smith
Michael Smith
Maria Garcia
James Johnson
William Miller
Who is the person selected above to you?
My supervisor
My colleague
My subordinate
Supervisor evaluation
This evaluation is for the supervisor selected earlier. Please review the statements below and evaluate honestly
The evaluatee fully understands and follows his / her work objectives
The evaluatee focuses on his / her work objectives
The evaluatee continuously tracks the progress of his / her work
The evaluatee has work related expertise
The evaluatee handles his / her work efficiently
The evaluatee completes his / her given work within the designated time
The evaluatee is objective in his / her work evaluations
The evaluatee has good understanding of the work capability of his / her subordinates
The evaluatee is enthusiastic about the training his / her subordinates
The evaluatee is objective in the work capability evaluation of his / her subordinates
The evaluatee actively discusses work-related issues with his / her subordinates
The evaluatee listenes to the suggestions of his / her subordinates
The evaluatee works in a rational manner (not emotional)
The evaluatee handles work-related incidents well
The evaluatee makes work-related decisions rationally
The evaluatee takes his / her work-related responsibility seriously
The evaluatee is moral in his / her work
The evaluatee always accepts work-related discussions if there is a need
The evaluatee treats his / her colleagues with respect
What is the strength of the evaluatee ?
What is the weakness of the evaluatee ?
How likely are you to recommend the evaluatee to your colleagues as a supervisor?
Any comment about the evaluatee?
Colleague evaluation
This evaluation is for the colleague selected earlier. Please review the statements below and evaluate honestly
The evaluatee fully understands and follows his / her work objectives
The evaluatee focuses on his / her work objectives
The evaluatee continuously tracks the progress of his / her work
The evaluatee has work related expertise
The evaluatee handles his / her work efficiently
The evaluatee completes his / her given work within the designated time
The evaluatee is objective in his / her work evaluations
The evaluatee is enthusiastic to provide work-related suggestions and ideas
The evaluatee works in a rational manner (not emotional)
The evaluatee handles work-related incidents well
The evaluatee makes work-related decisions rationally
The evaluatee takes his / her work-related responsibility seriously
The evaluatee is moral in his / her work
The evaluatee always accepts work-related discussions if there is a need
The evaluatee treats his / her colleagues with respect
What is the strength of the evaluatee ?
What is the weakness of the evaluatee ?
How likely are you to recommend the evaluatee to your colleagues as a colleague?
Any comment about the evaluatee?
Subordinate evaluation
This evaluation is for the subordinate selected earlier. Please review the statements below and evaluate honestly
The evaluatee fully understands and follows his / her work objectives
The evaluatee focuses on his / her work objectives
The evaluatee continuously tracks the progress of his / her work
The evaluatee has work related expertise
The evaluatee handles his / her work efficiently
The evaluatee completes his / her given work within the designated time
The evaluatee is objective in his / her work evaluations
The evaluatee is enthusiastic to provide work-related suggestions and ideas
The evaluatee is willing to learn something new
The evaluatee is quick to learn something new
The evaluatee works in a rational manner (not emotional)
The evaluatee handles work-related incidents well
The evaluatee makes work-related decisions rationally
The evaluatee takes his / her work-related responsibility seriously
The evaluatee is moral in his / her work
The evaluatee always accepts work-related discussions if there is a need
The evaluatee treats his / her colleagues with respect
What is the strength of the evaluatee ?
What is the weakness of the evaluatee ?
How likely are you to recommend the evaluatee to your colleagues as a subordinate?
Any comment about the evaluatee?